Case 2303632/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Ologunebi v Weston College — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303632/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freer Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Ologunebi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 30 April 2020, Employment Judge Freer recorded that the proceedings in case 2303632/2019 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by Mr K Ologunebi. The judgment does not set out any merits findings or liability determination.
No remedy is recorded in the judgment. The case ended procedurally on withdrawal, so the tribunal did not make substantive findings on the underlying allegations.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim and contains no merits findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim and contains no merits findings. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type inferred from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim and contains no merits findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.