Case 2303632/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J Pot v Hot Cakes Artists and Events Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2303632/2024
- Decision date
- 21 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. J Pot
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a breach of contract claim for unpaid notice pay and loss of accrued annual leave. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant and from Mr Child, and refused the respondents' applications to add further evidence, amend the grounds of resistance, and postpone the hearing.
The tribunal found that the claimant worked as a senior logistics manager from 1 September 2023 to 29 March 2024. He was given one week's notice on 22 March 2024 and was paid one week's notice pay. Under the contract, there was no contractual notice entitlement during the probationary period; otherwise, two months' notice was payable. There was a dispute about an early January 2024 conversation in which the probationary period was extended. The tribunal accepted Mr Child's evidence that the extension was for three months from the date of that meeting, rather than three months from 1 December.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the probationary period did not end until early April 2024. The claimant was therefore still in probation when dismissed on 29 March 2024 and was not entitled to two months' notice. The breach of contract claim was dismissed, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim was pleaded as unpaid notice pay and loss of accrued annual leave. The judgment states that the claimant remained in his probationary period when dismissed, so he was not entitled to two months' notice and the breach of contract claim failed. The text also states that the initial probationary period ran from 1 September 2023 to 1 December 2024, which appears inconsistent with the employment timeline, but the tribunal's finding on the extension to early April 2024 is clear. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.