Case 2303633/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Ashford v Wandsworth Oasis Trading Company Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303633/2023
- Decision date
- 31 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hart
- Panel members
- Ms Dengate, Ms Evans
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Ashford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London South by CVP on 28-31 January 2025, gave a unanimous judgment in Mrs Ashford's case against Wandsworth Oasis Trading Company Ltd. The panel comprised Employment Judge Hart, Ms Dengate and Ms Evans. The judgment records only the outcomes and does not set out written reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The Claimant's constructive dismissal claim was not upheld and was dismissed. The Claimant's claims for direct sexual orientation discrimination were also not upheld and were dismissed. No remedy was recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment records that the Claimant's claims for direct sexual orientation discrimination were not upheld and were dismissed. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.