Miss J Slann v Swale Academies Trust — 2026

Case reference: 2303634/2020
Decision date: 24 March 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Andrews

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss J Slann

Respondent

Swale Academies Trust

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal wrote to Miss J Slann on 27 January 2026 warning that it was considering striking out the claim because it appeared not to have been actively pursued, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing.

The claimant did not reply. On that basis, Employment Judge Andrews held that the claim should be struck out. The judgment dated 24 March 2026 records no substantive determination of the underlying employment claims and no monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The Tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it appeared not to have been actively pursued. The claimant did not reply to the Tribunal's warning letter dated 27 January 2026 or request a hearing.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.