Case 2303638/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Lotay v The Royal Bank Of Scotland Group plc — 2026
- Case reference
- 2303638/2018
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Lotay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. It states that the proceedings are dismissed following that withdrawal.
No findings on the merits of the claims, liability, remedy, or the parties' evidence are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The gov.uk listing identifies race discrimination, but the judgment text does not set out individual pleaded claims. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The gov.uk listing identifies sexual orientation discrimination, but the judgment text does not set out individual pleaded claims. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The gov.uk listing identifies victimisation, but the judgment text does not set out individual pleaded claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.