Case 2303644/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Noon v Kavanagh Motor Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303644/2018
- Decision date
- 4 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cheetham QC
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Noon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in London South on 26 November 2019, Employment Judge Cheetham QC held that Mr H Noon was unfairly dismissed under s.103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal found that there was a 25% chance that, if a fair procedure had been followed, he would nevertheless have been fairly dismissed.
On remedy, the tribunal recorded a compensation figure of £3,928.82 and reduced it to £2,946.62 to reflect that 25% chance assessment. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal held that Mr H Noon was unfairly dismissed pursuant to s.103A ERA 1996. It found there was a 25% chance that, had a fair procedure been followed, he would still have been fairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | £2,947 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,947
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,947
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.103A ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.