Case 2303644/2022 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Mr P Brown director (from 11.35am) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303644/2022
- Decision date
- 12 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott KC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by Forrest Road Brewing Company Limited from 17 November 2021 until 22 August 2022. The tribunal found that he drove beer delivery vans which were on occasion overloaded, that he raised concerns about this on a significant number of occasions, and that he refused to drive an overloaded vehicle. His work was described as satisfactory, including by the production manager, Ms Sarah Dobsen.
The respondent dismissed him by letter dated 22 August 2022, alleging harassment of other employees. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that the stated reason for dismissal changed during the process, including an initial allegation that he had made Mr Tom Cheeseman cry and then a later suggestion that he had made multiple people feel uncomfortable at work. On the evidence accepted by the tribunal, the principal reason for dismissal was the claimant's complaints about the overloading of vehicles and his refusal to drive them, which fell within section 100(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal therefore upheld the unfair dismissal claim brought for raising health and safety concerns. It awarded a basic award of £1,031.25, being one and a half weeks' gross pay, and a compensatory award of £8,405.38 for loss of wages from dismissal to 5 November 2022 and continuing loss until 1 July 2023, when the claimant's hourly rate increased from £11.50 to £13. The tribunal declined to award any further continuing loss or other heads of loss, making a total award of £9,436.63.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim succeeded under section 100(1)(c)(i) Employment Rights Act 1996 for raising health and safety concerns about overloaded delivery vans; the tribunal found the principal reason for dismissal was the claimant's complaints and refusal to drive the overloaded vehicles. | Upheld | — | £9,437 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,437
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,031
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £8,405
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- Abernethy v Mott Hay and Anderson
- W Devis & Sons Ltd v Atkins
- section 100(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 120 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.