Case 2303646/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Thomas v Kassak Foods Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303646/2024
- Decision date
- 3 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Curtis Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing proceeded in the absence of the Respondent under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024, the Tribunal noting that tribunal correspondence had been sent to the Respondent's registered address and that the Respondent had neither entered a response nor participated in the proceedings. Employment Judge Curtis sat alone at London South ET (by video) on 3 February 2025, with the Claimant appearing in person.
The Tribunal found that the Respondent had dismissed the Claimant without notice in breach of contract, and ordered damages of £692 (gross). It further found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay the Claimant for work undertaken in February 2024, ordering payment of £3,000 (gross). The Claimant's claim under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for accrued but untaken leave succeeded, with £1,291.72 awarded.
The Tribunal also found that the Respondent had failed to provide a statement of employment particulars as required by s.1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and made an additional award of 2 weeks' pay under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002 in the sum of £1,384. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissal without notice; damages of £692 gross awarded. | Upheld | — | £692 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions for work undertaken in February 2024. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
| Working time regulations | Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998 — payment for accrued but untaken leave on termination. | Upheld | — | £1,292 |
| Other | Failure to provide s.1 ERA 1996 statement of employment particulars; additional award of 2 weeks' pay under s.38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,384 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,368
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.