Case 2303650/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Saxton v Hair Theatre — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303650/2022
- Decision date
- 25 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Saxton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss L Saxton's unfair dismissal complaint. It recorded that, by a letter dated 28 November 2022, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had no reasonable prospects of success.
The claimant did not make any representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The reasons page also notes that the claimant's remaining claim was still listed for hearing on 20 June 2023, with the time estimate reduced to 3 hours.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 28 November 2022 to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out for having no reasonable prospects of success. The claimant did not make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.