Case 2303651/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Jade Bramwell v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303651/2024
- Decision date
- 7 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lambert Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Jade Bramwell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Lambert at London South Employment Tribunal by remote hearing from 3 to 7 November 2025. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Chaudhry, Solicitor-Advocate.
The judgment states that the claimant's claims are not well-founded and are dismissed. No written reasons are included in the judgment, and it records that reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment is a short rule 61 judgment stating that the claimant's claims are not well-founded and are dismissed. It does not set out individual issues or reasons; this claim type follows the gov.uk listing category. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment is a short rule 61 judgment stating that the claimant's claims are not well-founded and are dismissed. It does not set out individual issues or reasons; this claim type follows the gov.uk listing category. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.