Case 2303655/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Sami Meqran v Kemp Recruitment Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303655/2022
- Decision date
- 7 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Sami Meqran
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Sami Meqran, failed to attend the preliminary hearing listed for 7 August 2023. The tribunal noted that rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure allows dismissal where a party fails to attend or to be represented. It also recorded that there had been no communication from the claimant since the claim was lodged, apart from an email sent on 29 November 2022 saying that he did not think he could make it because he had a lot of commitments during that time of year.
The main complaint in the claim form was that the claimant had not been paid his correct wages for three days worked as a temporary worker in August 2022. The respondent's explanation was that there had been a delay in obtaining the relevant timesheets from the client company and that a final payment was made shortly after the claim form was issued. The claim form also contained brief allegations of harassment or discrimination on grounds of race or religion, but the tribunal said these related to employees at the client company, for whom the respondent was not responsible.
In those circumstances, and taking account of the claimant's non-attendance and the earlier email, the tribunal concluded that there were no outstanding issues which the claimant intended to pursue and dismissed the claim. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The main complaint was that the claimant had not been paid his correct wages for the three days he worked as a temporary worker in August 2022. The respondent said there had been a delay in obtaining the relevant timesheets from the client company and that a final payment was made shortly after the claim form was issued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The claim form contained brief allegations of harassment or discrimination on grounds of race or religion. The tribunal said these related to employees at the client company, for whom the respondent was not responsible, and dismissed the claim when the claimant did not attend the hearing. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The claim form contained brief allegations of harassment or discrimination on grounds of race or religion. The tribunal said these related to employees at the client company, for whom the respondent was not responsible, and dismissed the claim when the claimant did not attend the hearing. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.