Case 2303675/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Bodo v Serco Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303675/2023
- Decision date
- 10 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Bodo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the complaints of pregnancy and maternity discrimination, marriage or civil partnership discrimination, unauthorised deduction from wages, and failure to pay accrued but untaken annual leave. Those complaints were dismissed following that withdrawal under a judgment on withdrawal.
The judgment does not determine the merits of those withdrawn complaints and records that the claimant's remaining claims were to proceed to the hearing listed for 8 to 10 December 2025. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states this complaint was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | The judgment states this complaint was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states this complaint was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as failure to pay accrued but untaken annual leave and states it was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.