Case 2303682/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Harris v True Beauty Skincare Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303682/2019
- Decision date
- 31 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Harris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hyams-Parish entered judgment under Rule 21. The tribunal found that True Beauty Skincare Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss C Harris's wages and ordered payment of £768.75. The written record does not give reasons beyond the outcome and the amount awarded.
The tribunal also found that the Claimant had not been given the required period of notice under the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered the Respondent to pay one week's pay of £86.10. The judgment states that the Claimant is responsible for any tax and national insurance due on the award at paragraph 1. No other remedies are recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £769 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the Claimant was not given the required period of notice under the Employment Rights Act 1996 and awards one week’s pay. | Upheld | — | £86 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £855
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.