Case 2303689/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Magara, Solicitor For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303689/2019
- Decision date
- 23 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Date
- Panel members
- Ms P Barratt, Ms H Bharadia
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr R Magara, Solicitor For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal sat in London South before Employment Judge K Andrews, with Ms P Barratt and Ms H Bharadia as members, over 21 to 23 February 2022. The claimant was Mr C Mills and the respondent was Sky In-Home Services Limited.
The written judgment records the unanimous decision of the Tribunal that all claims failed and were dismissed. On the face of the judgment, that includes the unfair dismissal claim and the disability discrimination claim listed in the case context.
The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons, stating only that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.