Case 2303703/2017 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Greg Burgess, solicitor. — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303703/2017
- Decision date
- 3 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott QC
- Panel members
- Mrs C Brown, Mr H Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal at London South, chaired by Employment Judge Truscott QC with Mrs C Brown and Mr H Smith, heard the case on 2 and 3 April 2019. In its unanimous judgment dated 3 April 2019, it dismissed the claimant's claim of direct race discrimination on account of nationality contrary to section 13 of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's claim of indirect race discrimination on account of nationality contrary to section 19 of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment records no liability finding in the claimant's favour and does not record any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that this was a claim of direct race discrimination on account of nationality contrary to section 13 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that this was a claim of indirect race discrimination on account of nationality contrary to section 19 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.19 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.