Case 2303707/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Paine v Stanley Duce Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303707/2025
- Decision date
- 9 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Paine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss K Paine presented her claim in the London South Employment Tribunal on 30 March 2025. The respondent, Stanley Duce Ltd, failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It therefore ordered Stanley Duce Ltd to pay Miss Paine £1,148.58 gross.
The judgment records a total payment of £1,148.58. No separate breakdown of remedy components is given beyond the holiday entitlement sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal determined under rule 22 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. It found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,148.58 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,149 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,149
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.