Case 2303715/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Southern Gem Displays Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303715/2019
- Decision date
- 29 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South Employment Tribunal on 29 January 2020 before Employment Judge Webster. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims for redundancy payment, notice pay and unpaid holiday pay were upheld.
The tribunal ordered payment of the balance of statutory redundancy payment still owing, assessed at £956.52, together with 6 weeks' statutory notice pay of £1,646.82. It also awarded £109.78 for 2 days' unpaid holiday pay.
In addition, the tribunal awarded £274.47 for 1 week's unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 28 May to 5 June 2019. The total amount payable was £2,987.59. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment upheld the claimant's redundancy payment claim and awarded the balance of statutory redundancy payment still owing. | Upheld | — | £957 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment upheld the claimant's notice pay claim and awarded 6 weeks' statutory notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,647 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment upheld the claimant's unpaid holiday pay claim and awarded 2 days' unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £110 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment also awarded 1 week's unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 28 May to 5 June 2019. | Upheld | — | £274 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,988
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.