Case 2303729/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Rajendran v KP Trading Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303729/2021
- Decision date
- 24 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrington Appearances
- Venue
- Remotely
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Rajendran
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP on 23 February 2022 before Employment Judge Harrington, with the Claimant appearing in person and the Respondent represented by its director, Mr K Singh. The judgment records a single claim for unlawful deduction from earnings.
The tribunal found that the Claimant’s unlawful deduction from earnings claim was well founded and succeeded. It ordered the Respondent, KP Trading Limited, to pay £4,559.25. The judgment states that this sum was made up of 13 days unpaid wages, 7 days unpaid holiday pay, and 5 days unpaid notice pay, calculated at a daily rate of £182.37.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award was stated to comprise 13 days unpaid wages, 7 days unpaid holiday pay, and 5 days unpaid notice pay, calculated at a daily rate of £182.37. | Upheld | — | £4,559 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,559
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.