Case 2303752/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Johnson v 1) Knights Youth Centre 2) Millicent Grant 3) Chris Giles 4) John Saunders 5) Dave Dowi 6) Martin Long 7) John Marshall 8) Rob Quinn 9) Chris Saunders — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303752/2018
- Decision date
- 30 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment is a brief procedural disposal only. It records case numbers 2303752/2018, 2301282/2019, 2301283/2019 and 2301284/2019, with Mr J Johnson as claimant and Knights Youth Centre and eight named individuals as respondents.
The tribunal stated that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No merits findings, liability findings, or substantive reasons are set out in the extracted text, and no compensation or other remedy is recorded.
On the face of the extracted text, this was a judge-alone judgment signed by Employment Judge Khalil Date on 30 January 2020. The text does not list any lay members, and it does not specify the underlying claim types in the judgment extract itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text records only that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. It does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.