Case 2303785/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Engler v CareerXI Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2303785/2019
- Decision date
- 10 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Braganza Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Engler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 10 February 2021, held by CVP, Employment Judge Braganza heard the claimant in person and recorded no appearance for the respondent. The tribunal found that the claimant's claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract were well founded and succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a gross sum of £7,756.85 for the unauthorised deductions from wages properly payable to him. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £6,993.91 gross for that breach.
The total sum ordered was £14,750.76. The judgment states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages well founded and ordered payment of the gross sum identified as properly payable. | Upheld | — | £7,757 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages in the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £6,994 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,751
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.