Case 2303786/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Fallon v Strode Park Foundation — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303786/2018
- Decision date
- 9 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Fallon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment dated 9 January 2020 states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mrs S Fallon. No substantive findings on liability were made, and the text provided does not record any remedy or award.
The case was listed on GOV.UK under age discrimination, disability discrimination and unfair dismissal. On the face of the judgment text provided, the tribunal did not determine those claims on their merits because the claim was withdrawn before final determination.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment text records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it contains no merits findings on this head. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment text records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it contains no merits findings on this head. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment text records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; it contains no merits findings on this head. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.