Case 2303793/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss. R. McKay v Woodcote Dental Practice — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303793/2024
- Decision date
- 4 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss. R. McKay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss R. McKay’s claim against Woodcote Dental Practice was heard at London South Employment Tribunal on 4 June 2025 by Employment Judge Sudra sitting alone, with the claimant unrepresented and the respondent represented by Ms. G. Young. The tribunal disposed of the case by dismissing the claim because it had no jurisdiction to consider it.
The written record does not set out substantive findings on the merits of the underlying dispute. It also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal’s standard notice.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record does not state the substantive legal basis of the claim, but the GOV.UK listing category for the case is unfair dismissal. The tribunal dismissed the claim because it had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.