Case 2303799/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Blake v Ridge Crest Cleaning Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303799/2019
- Decision date
- 5 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Blake
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short disposal order. It records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr H Blake, against Ridge Crest Cleaning Limited.
No substantive findings on liability, facts, or remedy are set out in the extracted text. The order is limited to the procedural outcome that the case was brought to an end after withdrawal.
The PDF text does not identify any hearing evidence, legal test, or monetary award. No lay members are listed, and the matter appears to have been determined by Employment Judge Balogun sitting alone on 5 March 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted PDF text does not specify the underlying cause of action for this case, but the gov.uk listing categories include breach of contract. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted PDF text does not separately identify this claim, but the gov.uk listing categories include unlawful deduction from wages. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.