Case 2303808/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Oliwia Torres v Electrosonic Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303808/2024
- Decision date
- 21 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Oliwia Torres
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Oliwia Torres brought claims concerning notice pay, holiday pay and unlawful deductions from salary. The tribunal noted that she also raised a point about alleged non-payment of PAYE income tax, but explained that it had no jurisdiction to consider that issue. It also recorded that she had referred in a later statement to wrongful/unfair dismissal, but she had not claimed unfair dismissal in her ET1 and in any event had insufficient service to bring such a claim.
The tribunal relied on the dismissal letter of 22 January 2024, which stated that the claimant was dismissed for poor performance on one week's payment in lieu of notice, that one day's pay would be deducted because she had taken three days of holiday against a two-day entitlement, and that two further days' pay would be deducted because she had been off sick for two days and was only entitled to SSP after three days. Her January 2024 payslip showed a PILON payment of £576.92 and deductions of £230.77 and £115.38.
At hearing, the claimant accepted that she had received the PILON payment, accepted that the holiday deduction was due, and accepted that she owed the sickness deduction. Her position was that she was uncertain about the calculations, but she produced no alternative calculations or other evidence showing that further sums were due. The tribunal held that the burden was on the claimant to satisfy it as to any sums due to her, found that she had offered no such evidence, and dismissed the claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The notice pay claim failed. The dismissal letter and January 2024 payslip showed one week's PILON of £576.92, and the claimant accepted that she had received that payment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday-related claim failed. The dismissal letter said one day's pay would be deducted because the claimant had taken three days' holiday against a two-day entitlement, and the January 2024 payslip showed a deduction of £115.38, which the claimant accepted was due. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The salary deduction claim failed. The dismissal letter and January 2024 payslip showed deductions of £230.77 for two days' sickness absence, and the claimant accepted that she owed those sums. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.