Case 2303820/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr James McCabe v Home Office — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303820/2023
- Decision date
- 14 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr James McCabe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Croydon by video on 14 December 2023 before Employment Judge Fowell. The claimant, Mr James McCabe, did not attend and was not represented. The respondent, Home Office, was represented by counsel instructed by the Treasury Solicitor.
The tribunal recorded that all practicable enquiries had been made and then dismissed the claim in its entirety under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the underlying complaint and does not identify the specific heads of claim in the decision text provided.
No remedy was awarded because the claim was dismissed in full. No legal test is cited in the judgment beyond Rule 47 itself, and there are no lay members listed for this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action; it states only that the claim was dismissed in its entirety after the claimant failed to attend or be represented. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.