Case 2303832/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr John Annett v London Stock Photography Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303832/2022
- Decision date
- 16 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Wright
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr John Annett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr John Annett’s claim against London Stock Photography Ltd was determined by Employment Judge D Wright sitting alone at London South via CVP on 16 March 2023. The respondent did not attend and was subject to Rule 21 restrictions. The tribunal also amended the respondent’s name to London Stock Photography Limited and dispensed with re-service of the claim form.
The tribunal upheld three claims for unlawful deduction from wages. It found that the respondent had failed to pay wages for August 2022 in the gross sum of £769.20, had failed to pay unused and accrued holiday pay in the gross sum of £528.83, and had failed to reimburse expenses in the sum of £130 where the claimant had a contractual right to reimbursement.
The total sum awarded to the claimant was £1,428.03. The judgment records that deductions required by HMRC for tax and national insurance may be made before final payment. No separate award structure is set out for these claims beyond the individual sums and the total.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages for August 2022; the tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages in the gross sum of £769.20. | Upheld | — | £769 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unused and accrued holiday pay; the tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages in the gross sum of £528.83. | Upheld | — | £529 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid expenses to which the claimant had a contractual right to reimbursement; the tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages in the sum of £130. | Upheld | — | £130 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,428
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.