Case 2303834/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Fountain v Theatre Experiential Agency Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303834/2022
- Decision date
- 6 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Perry Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Fountain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Fountain brought claims of unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract arising from alleged unpaid work on 27 May and 3 June 2022 and a claimed commission arrangement. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant, Mr Glenn Brighty and Mr Duncan, with limited documentary material including photographs and the respondent’s app records. It found that the respondent had agreed to pay the claimant £100 per day plus £20 travel for the Bestway shifts, and that the Mayflower Cruise Terminal commission arrangement was between Mr Brighty and the respondent, not between the claimant and the respondent.
On the unpaid-wages claim, the tribunal found on the balance of probabilities that the claimant was not at the Bestway store on 27 May and 3 June 2022, other than possibly briefly to sign in. It relied on the respondent’s check-in and check-out records, Bestway’s report that the claimant was not there, and the fact that the photograph provided for 3 June did not show Bestway’s till. Because the tribunal found she had not worked the shifts, it concluded that no wages were payable and there was no unlawful deduction.
The commission claim was also dismissed. The tribunal found that the claimant was not a party to the commission agreement and described the matter as a commercial claim arising from an agreement between Mr Brighty and the respondent. It therefore dismissed that claim as well. The judgment recorded no award of compensation or other monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant was not working at Bestway on 27 May and 3 June 2022, other than possibly briefly to sign in, so she had no legal entitlement to wages and the claim failed. The judgment contains a stray reference to 2021 in the findings/conclusions, but the evidence and case context are to 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The commission arrangement was found to be between Mr Brighty and the respondent, not the claimant. The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to determine that commercial claim and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.27(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- New Century Cleaning Co Ltd v Church [2000] IRLR 27
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.