Case 2303837/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E A Navarro Oliveira v Hexis Recruitment — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303837/2022
- Decision date
- 9 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E A Navarro Oliveira
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs E A Navarro Oliveira presented a claim against Hexis Recruitment in the London South Employment Tribunals on 1 November 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages of £1,272.37 and car parking expenses of £360.00. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,632.37 gross in total.
The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for any amounts due to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions. The hearing listed for 24 March 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages of £1,272.37 and car parking expenses of £360.00, making a total gross payment due of £1,632.37. | Upheld | — | £1,632 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,632
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.