Case 2303849/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Kerubino v Christopher Evernden — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303849/2022
- Decision date
- 6 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Kerubino
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 16 January 2025, the tribunal gave Miss Kerubino an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that she failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The order was approved by Employment Judge Andrews Date on 3 February 2025 and sent to the parties on 6 February 2025. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not break out individual causes of action; this claim type is inferred from the case listing provided in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' and does not break out individual causes of action; this claim type is inferred from the case listing provided in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.