Case 2303860/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Pearson v Africa Professional Services Group Limited (in voluntary liquidation) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303860/2024
- Decision date
- 28 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr T Pearson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ramsden, sitting alone at London South on 24 April 2025, determined the claim under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 after neither respondent presented a Response. The First Respondent (Mr Pearson's former employer, in creditors' voluntary liquidation since 4 June 2024) was found to have made a continuous series of unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages between June 2022 and February 2024, to have failed to pay commission earned in 2021-2023, and to have failed to reimburse work-related expenses. The Claimant resigned on 12 February 2024 in response to these failures and commenced new, more remunerative employment on 19 February 2024.
The Tribunal upheld the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal under s.94 ERA 1996, awarding a basic award of £3,215 (capped at £643/week for five complete years of service at age 35) and a compensatory award limited to £500 for loss of statutory rights, since the Claimant's swift re-employment at a higher salary meant no loss of earnings was awarded. The unauthorised deductions complaints under s.13 ERA 1996 were upheld in the aggregate sum of £72,359.33, with the commission element reduced under the two-year lookback in s.23(4A) by reference to the Claimant's own evidence of consistent monthly revenue. The breach of contract complaint for unpaid expenses was upheld at £7,920.08 including debt-servicing costs.
Applying the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010 and the Court of Appeal decision in Watson v Hemingway Design Ltd [2021] ICR 1034, the Tribunal found that the Second Respondent, as legal expenses insurer of the First Respondent under a policy with a £100,000 cap, is potentially liable to the Claimant as a third party for the First Respondent's liabilities established in this judgment. The First Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £83,994.41 in aggregate.
Claims and outcomes
10 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal under s.94 ERA 1996. Basic award £3,215 (5 years' service, age 35, statutory cap £643/week). Compensatory award £500 for loss of statutory rights only; no loss of earnings as the Claimant started new, more remunerative employment on 19 February 2024. | Upheld | — | £3,715 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment treats the constructive dismissal claim as a complaint of constructive unfair dismissal under s.94 ERA 1996; recorded here to mirror gov.uk listing and the tribunal's framing. Remedy figure is the same award as the constructive_dismissal entry and should not be double-counted; the aggregate award is captured in remedies.total_award. | Upheld | — | £3,715 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions under s.13 ERA 1996, comprising £28,134 unpaid salary (June 2022 to February 2024), £1,108 unpaid holiday pay (treated by the tribunal as part of the deductions claim, not a separate WTR claim), £36,583.33 unpaid commission (within the two-year lookback under s.23(4A), reduced from the Claimant's full £58,795 figure), plus £6,534 in debt-servicing costs arising from the failure to pay salary. | Upheld | — | £72,359 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday (3.6 days) on termination, awarded as part of the unauthorised deductions complaint. Recorded separately to reflect the gov.uk listing's Working Time Regulations category; the £1,108 is already included in the £72,359.33 deductions figure and should not be double-counted in the aggregate. | Upheld | — | £1,108 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £83,994
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,215
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23(4A) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010
- Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Watson v Hemingway Design Ltd [2021] ICR 1034
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.