Case 2303865/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Cacaj v Alcatel Submarine Network Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303865/2018
- Decision date
- 14 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Cacaj
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short disposal order. Employment Judge Khalil recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant, Mr G Cacaj, on 14 October 2019. No findings of fact, liability determination, or remedy assessment are set out in the text provided.
The available case listing information identifies the matter as including breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, and working time issues, but the judgment itself does not analyse those claims or determine them on the merits. The only outcome recorded is dismissal after withdrawal. No monetary award is stated.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. No merits determination is given. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. No merits determination is given. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. No merits determination is given. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.