Case 2303895/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Helen Marsh v Austen Marketing Associates Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303895/2023
- Decision date
- 29 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tueje REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Helen Marsh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 28 October 2025, which took place in private via CVP, the claimant did not attend and the respondent was represented by Mr Inns, a director. Employment Judge Tueje dealt with the claim on the basis of the material before the Tribunal.
The judgment records that the claims of discrimination on the grounds of age, sex and sexual orientation were struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(c) because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal Rules or with a Tribunal order. No substantive findings on the merits of the discrimination allegations are set out in the written record. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | Sexual orientation | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(c)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.