Case 2303914/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Buklierius v Ricoh Site Solutions — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303914/2018
- Decision date
- 14 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Buklierius
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal in case 2303914/2018, between Mr A Buklierius and Ricoh Site Solutions, struck out the claim. The only reason given was procedural: by letter dated 24 November 2022 the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out for want of active pursuit, or to request a hearing.
The Claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Acting Regional Employment Judge Balogun stated that the claim was struck out. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim or any award of compensation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted reasons do not identify the underlying substantive cause of action. The Tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued and the Claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the letter dated 24 November 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.