Case 2303917/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G May v 186 Restaurant CO (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303917/2023
- Decision date
- 14 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G May
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Miss G May's unfair dismissal complaint should be struck out. It recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have at least two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint, and found that the claimant had been employed by 186 Restaurant Co (in Voluntary Liquidation) for less than two years.
The tribunal therefore concluded that the claimant was not entitled to bring the complaint. It also found that she had not given an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Wright on 3 April 2025 and sent to the parties on 14 April 2025. The tribunal noted that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because the claimant had less than two years' service and was therefore not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.