Case 2303922/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Giles v Krv Retail Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303922/2018
- Decision date
- 16 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge HYDE Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Giles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the case was determined under Rule 21, with the respondent not appearing or otherwise participating in the decision. Employment Judge Hyde recorded that the claim succeeds, but no reasons are set out in the extracted text beyond that conclusion.
The tribunal did not assess remedy in this judgment. It stated that the remedy to which Mrs A Giles is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing on a date to be notified.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Rule 21 judgment stated that the claim succeeds and that remedy would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.