Case 2303936/2024 · Employment Tribunal

Miss A Gray v X-Pharm Ltd t/a Touchwood Pharmacy — 2025

Case reference: 2303936/2024
Decision date: 12 December 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Cawthray
Panel members: Mr C Wilby, Ms G Mitchell

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss A Gray

Respondent

X-Pharm Ltd t/a Touchwood Pharmacy

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal heard the case at London South by video on 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 December 2025 before Employment Judge Cawthray, Mr C Wilby and Ms G Mitchell.

The judgment records that the complaints of direct race discrimination, indirect race discrimination, detriment for making a protected disclosure, automatically unfair dismissal under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996, and automatically unfair dismissal under section 12 Employment Relations Act 1999 were not well-founded and were dismissed. The provided text states that reasons were given orally and does not include written reasons.

Claims and outcomes

5 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	The judgment states that the complaint of direct race discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed. Written reasons are not included in the provided text.	Dismissed	Race	—
Race discrimination	The judgment states that the complaint of indirect race discrimination was not well-founded and was dismissed. Written reasons are not included in the provided text.	Dismissed	Race	—
Whistleblowing	The judgment states that the complaint of being subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure was not well-founded and was dismissed. Written reasons are not included in the provided text.	Dismissed	—	—
Whistleblowing	The judgment states that the complaint of automatically unfair dismissal under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded and was dismissed. Written reasons are not included in the provided text.	Dismissed	—	—
Trade union	The judgment states that the complaint of automatically unfair dismissal under section 12 Employment Relations Act 1999 was not well-founded and was dismissed. Written reasons are not included in the provided text.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.