Case 2303937/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Lauren Taylor v Easy As 123 Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303937/2019
- Decision date
- 12 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cheetham QC
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Lauren Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Lauren Taylor brought claims for breach of contract in respect of unpaid notice pay and unlawful deduction of wages in respect of unpaid holiday pay. The respondent did not attend the hearing, having notified the tribunal that it would rely on its written response.
On notice pay, the claimant produced her contract, which the tribunal found provided for three months' notice. It was common ground that the respondent had paid 46 days out of the 90 days' entitlement, leaving 44 days unpaid at £82.19 per day. The respondent argued that emails in July 2019 showed an agreed reduction of the notice period to 60 days, but the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that those emails formed part of ACAS settlement communications and were not a contractual variation.
The tribunal therefore found that the claimant had not agreed any change to her contractual notice entitlement and was entitled to the balance of her full contractual notice, amounting to £3,616.36. The respondent's statement that payment of the judgment might cause insolvency was not accepted as a reason to deny the contractual entitlement.
On holiday pay, the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that she had accrued 10 days' entitlement and had been paid only 2 days, leaving 8 days unpaid at £82.19 per day. The respondent said the claim was unreasonable because the claimant had taken a lot of time off when work was intermittent, but the tribunal had no evidence of that and preferred the claimant's evidence. The award for unpaid holiday pay was £657.52, making a total award of £4,273.88.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Unpaid notice pay. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that her contract provided for 3 months' notice and that she had not agreed any contractual variation to 60 days, despite the respondent's reliance on email exchanges said to form part of ACAS settlement communications. | Upheld | — | £3,616 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that she was owed 8 of the 10 days accrued and rejected the respondent's submission that the claim was unreasonable because of time off when work was intermittent, noting there was no evidence to support that assertion. | Upheld | — | £658 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,274
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.