Case 2303966/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Caddy v Aston Colour Press (UK) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303966/2018
- Decision date
- 9 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Caddy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the proceedings rather than determining the substantive merits of the claim. It recorded that Aston Colour Press (UK) Ltd had been dissolved on 18 June 2019 and that no application had been made to restore the company to the register.
The tribunal also noted that, by email sent on 9 July 2019, the claimant was asked to tell the tribunal within seven days whether he intended to restore the company to the register. No response was received from the claimant, and Employment Judge Tsamados Date issued the dismissal judgment on 10 September 2019.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not determine the merits of this claim. The proceedings were dismissed because the respondent company had been dissolved on 18 June 2019 and no application was made to restore it to the register. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment does not determine the merits of this claim. The proceedings were dismissed because the respondent company had been dissolved on 18 June 2019 and no application was made to restore it to the register. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not determine the merits of this claim. The proceedings were dismissed because the respondent company had been dissolved on 18 June 2019 and no application was made to restore it to the register. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not determine the merits of this claim. The proceedings were dismissed because the respondent company had been dissolved on 18 June 2019 and no application was made to restore it to the register. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.