Case 2303975/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Noor v Seven Resourcing Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2303975/2019
- Decision date
- 1 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell
- Venue
- London South via telephone
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Noor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim concerned unpaid work by Ms B Noor, who started as an agency Team Leader at a residential care home on 30 August 2019. The tribunal, sitting alone and in the Respondent's absence, found that she worked four long shifts on 31 August, 1 September, 2 September and 5 September 2019, that she had been told the assignment would last three months, and that after she raised a payment issue and contacted ACAS she received no further shifts and was not paid the money owed.
The judge found, on the balance of probabilities, that the agreement set weekday pay at £14 per hour, Saturday pay at £15 per hour, Sunday pay at £16 per hour and bank holiday pay at £17 per hour, with a one-week notice period but no fixed duration. He accepted the claimant's evidence that she would have been working four long shifts each week and would have earned around £815 per week.
Although the judge initially considered an award equivalent to eight weeks' pay, he revised that view after noting the claimant's evidence that she had tried to obtain other agency work without success. He concluded it was fair and equitable to award the pay for the week she worked plus a further 11 weeks' pay to cover the agreed three-month period. No separate sums were awarded for holiday pay or notice pay, and the Respondent was ordered to pay £9,776.25 gross, with the claimant to account to HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Judgment describes this as the claim for unpaid work. The claimant also sought holiday pay and notice pay, but the tribunal made no separate awards for those heads. | Upheld | — | £9,776 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,776
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.