Case 2303981/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Walters v Excel Passenger Services Ltd Mr D Kwame — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303981/2019
- Decision date
- 5 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Walters
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr Walters' claims against Excel Passenger Services Ltd and Mr D Kwame because of non-compliance with the Tribunal's unless order made on 26 July 2022. The judgment identifies the non-compliance as failure to comply with Orders 1.3 and 2.2.
The tribunal recorded that those requirements had been expressly explained to the claimant at the hearing, including the strict timescale for compliance. It also noted that paragraph 5.1 of the written record of the orders confirmed that the orders had to be complied with even if the written record of the hearing was received after the compliance date had passed.
No substantive determination of the merits is recorded, and no monetary award is made. The decision is limited to strike out for procedural non-compliance.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not restate the underlying head of claim in the body of the decision; this claim type is taken from the case listing. The tribunal struck out the claims for non-compliance with the unless order. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not restate the underlying head of claim in the body of the decision; this claim type is taken from the case listing. The tribunal struck out the claims for non-compliance with the unless order. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not restate the underlying head of claim in the body of the decision; this claim type is taken from the case listing. The tribunal struck out the claims for non-compliance with the unless order. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.