Case 2303985/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr P Merrett T/a MPD Transport — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303985/2019
- Decision date
- 20 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Meredith was employed by Mr P Merrett trading as MPD Transport from 1 May 2015 as a removals porter. His employment was summarily terminated on 15 May 2019 after a period of ill health due to kidney stones. The respondent did not attend the hearing, and the tribunal proceeded in its absence.
Applying s.98 ERA 1996, the tribunal found the respondent had not proved a potentially fair reason for dismissal and had not established grounds for dismissal without notice or payment in lieu of notice. On the claimant's evidence, the dismissal was unfair, and the tribunal also found he had not committed the misconduct alleged, so there was no basis to reduce compensation for contributory conduct. The tribunal accordingly held that he had been unfairly and wrongfully dismissed.
The tribunal also upheld the unlawful deductions claim under ss.13 and 23 ERA 1996. It found the claimant had been paid SSP at £37 per week when his statutory entitlement was £92.05 per week from 23 December 2018 to 6 April 2019 and £94.25 per week from 13 April 2019 to dismissal. It quantified the recoverable underpayment as £1,105.18.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £480, notice pay of £480 under ss.86 and 88 ERA 1996, a further £500 for loss of statutory rights, and £848.25 for nine weeks of post-dismissal SSP loss. It then applied a 25 per cent uplift for failure to comply with the ACAS Code, finding there was no evidence of even basic fair investigation or procedure. The total award was £4,266.79, comprising a pre-uplift total of £3,413.43 plus an uplift of £853.36.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair under s.98 ERA 1996 and did not reduce compensation for contributory conduct. The remedy formed part of a combined award and was uplifted under s.207A(2) TULRCA 1992. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the respondent had not established grounds to dismiss without notice or payment in lieu of notice. The notice pay element was included in the combined monetary award. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant had been underpaid SSP between 23 December 2018 and dismissal on 15 May 2019. It calculated the recoverable deduction from wages at £1,105.18. | Upheld | — | £1,105 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,267
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £480
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,933
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.98 ERA 1996
- ss.13 and 23 ERA 1996
- ss.86 and 88 ERA 1996
- s.207A(2) TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.