Case 2304004/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Adam Knell v Mr David Brooker — 2026
- Case reference
- 2304004/2022
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Adam Knell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr Adam Knell's unfair dismissal complaint. It found that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 required at least two years' service to bring such a claim, and that Mr Knell had been employed by Mr David Brooker for less than two years.
The judgment noted Mr Knell's reliance on the Respondent's alleged failure to pay minimum wage, but held that this did not remove the qualifying service requirement for an unfair dismissal complaint. It also recorded that he had been given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, but did not give an acceptable reason. The judgment stated that the Claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the Claimant had less than two years' service, so he was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under s.108 ERA 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.