Case 2304057/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Zenuni v Waterfront Grill Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304057/2022
- Decision date
- 12 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Zenuni
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South on 13 November 2023 before Employment Judge Heath. Neither the claimant nor the respondent attended the hearing.
On the non-attendance of both parties, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 12 December 2023. The record also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual practice.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not identify the substantive pleaded claim in the extracted text, but the gov.uk listing category for the case is Working Time Regulations. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.