Case 2304064/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. H. Toure v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304064/2023
- Decision date
- 30 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra Sitting
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms. F. Whiting, Ms. S. Khawaja
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. H. Toure
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal sat at London South Employment Tribunal over 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 29 and 30 July 2025, with Employment Judge Sudra sitting with non-legal members Ms. F. Whiting and Ms. S. Khawaja. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by counsel.
The unanimous decision of the Tribunal was that the Claimant's complaints were not well founded and were dismissed. The judgment does not set out separate findings or reasons for each complaint.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the Claimant's complaints were not well founded and dismissed; it does not give separate reasons for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the Claimant's complaints were not well founded and dismissed; it does not give separate reasons for this claim. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the Claimant's complaints were not well founded and dismissed; it does not give separate reasons for this claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.