Case 2304065/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Hollowday v Impact Sales Recruitment Limited (in liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304065/2019
- Decision date
- 8 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
- Venue
- Croydon via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Hollowday
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Hollowday brought a pregnancy discrimination claim after being interviewed twice and then offered a recruitment role on a salary of £18,000. After she disclosed that she was 18 weeks pregnant, the respondent said it had no issue employing someone who was expecting, but told her it was unhappy that she had not been upfront at the start of the process. The tribunal rejected the respondent's explanation that the offer had been withdrawn because she was dishonest, and also rejected the alternative explanation that recruitment had been paused because of a director's family circumstances, pointing to the second interview and the later invitations for the claimant to meet the directors.
The tribunal held that the respondent contravened section 18 Equality Act 2010 by treating the claimant unfavourably because of pregnancy, and made a declaration of unlawful discrimination. It also found, for completeness, that the claimant was not dishonest or lacking in integrity. For compensation, the tribunal accepted four months' net loss of salary and calculated that figure at £1,323 per month, producing £5,292. It then made an injury to feelings award of £4,000, describing the case as a single isolated act that fell within the lower Vento band and justifying a mid-point award. The total award was £9,292. The judgment records a proposed start date of 15/8/2020 at paragraph 4, but the compensation calculation at paragraph 20 was made on the basis of 15/8/2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Tribunal found the respondent withdrew the job offer because it learned the claimant was pregnant, contrary to sections 18 and 39 Equality Act 2010. It awarded £5,292 net loss of salary and £4,000 injury to feelings. The judgment states a proposed start date of 15/8/2020 at paragraph 4, but compensation was calculated on the basis of 15/8/2019 at paragraph 20. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £9,292 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,292
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £5,292
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 18 Equality Act 2010
- section 39 Equality Act 2010
- Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2003] IRLR 102 CA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.