Case 2304071/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Dimitrov v Health and Care Professions Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304071/2018
- Decision date
- 17 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
- Venue
- London South Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Dimitrov
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr G Dimitrov brought discrimination complaints against the Health & Care Professions Council in relation to applications he had made about his professional qualifications. The tribunal recorded the claim as one that could only be brought under sections 53 and 54 of the Equality Act 2010, because the respondent was acting as a qualifications body rather than as an employer or worker principal. The case was listed as an open preliminary hearing to decide the jurisdictional objection raised by the respondent.
The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction because section 120(7) Equality Act 2010 excluded Employment Tribunal jurisdiction where the complained-of act may, by virtue of an enactment, be subject to appeal or proceedings in the nature of an appeal. It accepted the respondent's submission that the Health Professions Order 2001 provided an appeal route first to the respondent's Council and then, if necessary, to the County Court. The tribunal found that the claimant had not yet availed himself of, or in one instance had not concluded, the available appeal process.
The reasons summarised four outstanding or related applications: the first, Counselling, was out of time for appeal but the claimant could still apply for a period of adaption or aptitude test; the second, Forensic, had been accepted; the third, Clinical, had an appeal outstanding and was due to be heard on 12 December 2019; and the fourth, Occupational, was ongoing pending further information from the claimant. The tribunal referred to General Medical Council and others v Michalak, King v Health Professions Council, and Koziel v Health Professions Council in support of its approach and dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction at an open preliminary hearing under s.120(7) EqA; no merits determination or remedy. The background at paragraph 1 identifies race and religion or belief discrimination, although paragraph 10 refers to disability and race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction at an open preliminary hearing under s.120(7) EqA; no merits determination or remedy. The background at paragraph 1 identifies race and religion or belief discrimination, although paragraph 10 refers to disability and race discrimination. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.53 Equality Act 2010
- s.54 Equality Act 2010
- s.120(7) Equality Act 2010
- Health Professions Order 2001, Articles 37 and 38
- General Medical Council and others v Michalak [2017] UKSC 71
- King v Health Professions Council [2013] ICR 39
- Koziel v Health Professions Council (UKET 1501802/2011)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.