Case 2304074/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Tooley v Sidcup Working Man’s Social Club & Institute Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304074/2019
- Decision date
- 19 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett
- Venue
- Croydon via remote Hearing
- Panel members
- Ms J Forecast, Mr K Murphy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Tooley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Croydon by remote hearing on 30 September 2020 before Employment Judge Sharkett, with Ms J Forecast and Mr K Murphy as the lay members. The claimant was Ms A Tooley and the respondent was Sidcup Working Man’s Social Club & Institute Limited.
The only substantive judgment recorded in the extracted text is that, during the relevant period of employment from May 2017 to May 2019, the claimant was not disabled for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. That finding resolved the disability-status issue against the claimant on the record provided.
No monetary award is recorded in the extracted text, and no separate findings on unfair dismissal or breach of contract appear in the supplied judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that, at the relevant time during the claimant's employment from May 2017 to May 2019, she was not disabled for the purposes of section 6 Equality Act 2010. No separate remedy or further claim outcome is recorded in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.