Case 2304093/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Woollard v F&M Drinks Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304093/2022
- Decision date
- 7 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Woollard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunal on 11 November 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge Wright determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a contested hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay £501.86 gross to the claimant.
The judgment records a single total award of £501.86 and states that the claimant no longer needed to attend the hearing listed for 14 April 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 default judgment. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £501.86 gross. | Upheld | — | £502 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £502
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.