Case 2304097/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr WH Primrose v Aequitas Packing Group (uk) Ltd. — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304097/2019
- Decision date
- 21 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr WH Primrose
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge P Davies found that Aequitas Packing Group (UK) Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr WH Primrose's wages and/or failed to pay notice monies. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £3,852.12 net in respect of that finding.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £1,251.94 net for that item. The hearing listed for 29 April 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and/or failed to pay notice monies. The award recorded against this finding is a net sum of £3,852.12. | Upheld | — | £3,852 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The award recorded against this finding is a net sum of £1,251.94. | Upheld | — | £1,252 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,104
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.