Case 2304104/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alex Bryers v GB Railfreight Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304104/2023
- Decision date
- 5 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Wilson Alison
- Panel members
- Alison Boyce, Mike Cann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Alex Bryers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaint of direct disability discrimination under Section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, finding it was not well founded.
The tribunal also dismissed the complaints of discrimination because of something arising in consequence of disability under Section 15, and failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability under Sections 20 and 21. The judgment records that the decision was delivered and explained orally at the hearing, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination under Section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination because of something arising in consequence of disability under Section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability under Sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010 was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.